Site icon Strike Force heroes4

Emerging uses of artificial intelligence in deep time biodiversity research

Emerging uses of artificial intelligence in deep time biodiversity research
  • Raup, D. M. & Sepkoski, J. J. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. N. Ser. 215, 1501–1503 (1982).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, M. J. Recovery of vertebrate faunas from the end-Permian mass extinction. J. Earth Sci. 21 111 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, M. J. Origins of biodiversity. PLoS Biol. (2016).

  • Marshall, C. R. Forty years later: the status of the ‘Big Five’ mass extinctions. Camb. Prism Extinct. 1, e5 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanovas-Vilar, I., van den Hoek Ostende, L. W., Janis, C. M. & Saarinen, J. eds. Evolution of Cenozoic Land Mammal Faunas and Ecosystems 25 Years of the NOW Database of Fossil Mammals Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series (Springer, 2023).

  • Uhen, M. D. et al. Paleobiology Database User Guide Version 1.0. PaleoBios 40(11) (2023).

  • Peters, S. E. & McClennen, M. The Paleobiology Database Application Programming Interface. Paleobiology 42, 1–7 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, L. M. et al. Cretaceous bird from Brazil informs the evolution of the avian skull and brain. Nature 635, 376–381 (2024).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas, K. J., Tiffany, B. H. & Knoll, A. H. Patterns in vascular land plant diversification. Nature 303, 1068–1070 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas, K. J. Measuring the tempo of plant death and birth. N. Phytol. 207, 254–256 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepkoski, J. J. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7 36–53 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, E. M., Thompson, S. E. D., Butler, R. J., Rosindell, J. & Close, R. A. Mechanistic neutral models show that sampling biases drive the apparent explosion of early tetrapod diversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1480–1489 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, R. A., Benson, R. B. J., Saupe, E. E., Clapham, M. E. & Butler, R. J. The spatial structure of Phanerozoic marine animal diversity. Science 368, 420–424 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijenga, B. R. & Close, R. A. Apparent timescaling of fossil diversification rates is caused by sampling bias. Curr. Biol. (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C. R. et al. Quantifying the dark data in museum fossil collections as palaeontology undergoes a second digital revolution. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180431 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Adaimé, M.-É., Urban, M. A., Kong, S., Jaramillo, C. & Punyasena, S. W. Pollen morphology, deep learning, phylogenetics, and the evolution of environmental adaptations in Podocarpus. New Phytol. 247, 1460–1473 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropsha, A., Isayev, O., Varnek, A., Schneider, G. & Cherkasov, A. Integrating QSAR modelling and deep learning in drug discovery: the emergence of deep QSAR. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 23, 141–155 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. et al. Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests. Nat. Commun. 14, 6191 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romera-Paredes, B. et al. Mathematical discoveries from program search with large language models. Nature 625, 468–475 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T. How AI can help to save endangered species. Nature 623, 232–233 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestro, D., Goria, S., Sterner, T. & Antonelli, A. Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence. Nat. Sustain. 5, 415–424 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christin, S., Hervet, É. & Lecomte, N. Applications for deep learning in ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1632–1644 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C. et al. Artificial intelligence in paleontology. Earth Sci. Rev. 252, 104765 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y. et al. Opportunities and challenges in applying AI to evolutionary morphology. Integr. Org. Biol. 6, 36 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mimura, K. et al. Applicability of object detection to microfossil research: implications from deep learning models to detect microfossil fish teeth and denticles using YOLO-v7. Earth Space Sci. 11, e2023EA003122 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Kamp, T. et al. Parasitoid biology preserved in mineralized fossils. Nat. Commun. 9, 3325 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, I. C. et al. Improving the taxonomy of fossil pollen using convolutional neural networks and superresolution microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28496–28505 (2020).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopperud, B. T., Lidgard, S. & Liow, L. H. Enhancing georeferenced biodiversity inventories: automated information extraction from literature records reveal the gaps. PeerJ 10, e13921 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, E. et al. DeepBryo: a web app for AI-assisted morphometric characterization of cheilostome bryozoans. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 21, 542–551 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. et al. Heterogeneous selectivity and morphological evolution of marine clades during the Permian–Triassic mass extinction. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1248–1258 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, B. C. et al. A deep neural network for high-throughput measurement of functional traits on museum skeletal specimens. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 347–359 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, C. et al. Fossil image identification using deep learning ensembles of data augmented multiviews. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 3020–3034 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. J. et al. How predictable are mass extinction events? R. Soc. Open Sci. 10, 221507 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, W. J. et al. Machine learning identifies ecological selectivity patterns across the end-Permian mass extinction. Paleobiology 48, 357–371 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, S. et al. Paleontological baselines for evaluating extinction risk in the modern oceans. Science 348, 567–570 (2015).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. B., Flannery-Sutherland, J. T. & Silvestro, D. DeepDive: estimating global biodiversity patterns through time using deep learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 4199 (2024).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickolls, J. & Dally, W. J. The GPU computing era. IEEE Micro (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaswani, A. et al.Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (eds. Guyon, I. et al.) (2017).

  • Koch, B., Denton, E., Hanna, A. & Foster, J. G. Reduced, reused and recycled: the life of a dataset in machine learning research. Preprint at (2021).

  • Villalobos, P. et al. Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data. Preprint at (2024).

  • Sayers, E. W. et al. GenBank 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D56–D61 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, J. Citizen Science on GBIF – 2019. GBIF Data Blog (2019).

  • Heberling, J. M., Miller, J. T., Noesgaard, D., Weingart, S. B. & Schigel, D. Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018093118 (2021).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaudie, J., Lazarus, D. B. & Diver, P. Nsb (Neptune Sandbox Berlin): an expanded and improved database of marine planktonic microfossil data and deep-sea stratigraphy. Palaeontol. Electron. 23, 1–28 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Žliobaitė, I. et al. The NOW database of fossil mammals. Vertebr. Paleobiol. Paleoanthropol. F1250, 33–42 (2023) .

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocsis, Á. T., Reddin, C. J., Alroy, J. & Kiessling, W. The R package divDyn for quantifying diversity dynamics using fossil sampling data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 735–743 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. et al. BioDeepTime: a database of biodiversity time series for modern and fossil assemblages. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 32, 1680–1689 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. A. et al. Increasing the equitability of data citation in paleontology: capacity building for the big data future. Paleobiology 50, 165–176 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. The number of living animal species likely to be fossilized. Fla. Scientist 40, 135–139 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote, M., Miller, A. I., Raup, D. M. & Stanley, S. M. Principles of Paleontology (Macmillan, 2007).

  • Andermann, T., Antonelli, A., Barrett, R. L. & Silvestro, D. Estimating alpha, beta, and gamma diversity through deep learning. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 839407 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang, F. et al. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proc. IEEE 109, 43–76 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. E. et al. Transfer learning for medical image classification: a literature review. BMC Med. Imaging 22, 69 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodoris, C. V. et al. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature 618, 616–624 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauffe, T., Cantalapiedra, J. L. & Silvestro, D. Trait-mediated speciation and human-driven extinctions in proboscideans revealed by unsupervised Bayesian neural networks. Sci. Adv. 10, eadl2643 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjoram, P., Molitor, J., Plagnol, V. & Tavaré, S. Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15324–15328 (2003).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvestro, D. et al. A 450 million years long latitudinal gradient in age-dependent extinction. Ecol. Lett. 23, 439–446 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, S., Voznica, J. & Morlon, H. Deep learning from phylogenies for diversification analyses. Syst. Biol. 72, 1262–1279 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Close, R. A. et al. Diversity dynamics of Phanerozoic terrestrial tetrapods at the local-community scale. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 590–597 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, W., Ali, H., Shah, Z. & Azmat, S. A new generative adversarial network for medical images super resolution. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–20 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, D. et al. Medical image synthesis with deep convolutional adversarial networks. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 65, 2720–2730 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khosravi, B. et al. Few-shot biomedical image segmentation using diffusion models: beyond image generation. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 242, 107832 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y. et al. SmartEdit: exploring complex instruction-based image editing with multimodal large language models. In 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), (IEEE, 2023).

  • Rawte, V., Sheth, A. & Das, A. A survey of hallucination in large foundation models. Preprint at (2023).

  • Zhang, Y. et al. Siren’s song in the AI ocean: a survey on hallucination in large language models. Comput. Linguist. (2025).

  • Bai, Y. et al. Training a helpful and harmless assistant with reinforcement learning from human feedback. Preprint at (2022).

  • Bagenal, J. Generative artificial intelligence and scientific publishing: urgent questions, difficult answers. Lancet 403, 1118–1120 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Exit mobile version