January 15, 2025

Strike Force heroes4

Connecting the World with Advanced Technology

7 CFO tips for yielding high ROI during the rush into generative AI

7 CFO tips for yielding high ROI during the rush into generative AI

Editor’s note: This is the second of two reports on the challenge of measuring return on investment from generative artificial intelligence. In part one, CFO Dive described how financial executives are plowing billions of dollars into generative artificial intelligence without a solid estimate of the potential gains.

To institutional investors, “speculation” is a four-letter word unless they happen to make a killing. For financial executives, acting on speculation is often a surefire trigger to job loss.

Yet CFOs across several industries are piling billions of dollars into generative artificial intelligence based on fuzzy forecasts of the likely payoff.

“It’s a noisy estimate,” said Daniel Rock, co-founder of AI consultancy Workhelix, referring to common projections of the gains from generative AI. “It doesn’t mean trying is not worth it.”

Generative AI has helped CFOs finely tune customer service, refine forecasting, speed software updates and upgrade other tasks.

Yet as AI brings “the industrialization of knowledge production,” financial executives face a challenge accurately forecasting the return on investment from new, powerful efforts to squeeze more value from data, according to Laura Veldkamp, a finance professor at Columbia University’s Business School.

The challenge often breaks the usual yardsticks for ROI: Data by its nature is harder to observe and price than assets that undergird the industrial era economy such as buildings and employees, Veldkamp said at a symposium on productivity held by the New York Federal Reserve in February.

“There’s a lot of things in this economy in general that we are going to have a hard time measuring and that we just don’t know enough about yet,” Prasanna Tambe, an associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School, said at the symposium. “Measurement remains a challenge.”

Despite ambiguity, the stampede into generative AI has swept up investors, financial executives and information technology companies of all sizes, CFOs and AI experts said.

“Speculative frenzies are part of technology, and so they are not something to be afraid of,” David Cahn, a partner at Sequoia Capital, said in a June research note. He sees a $600 billion gap between what companies are spending on AI-related infrastructure and the revenue needed to justify such outlays.

“Those who remain level-headed through this moment have the chance to build extremely important companies,” Cahn said. “But we need to make sure not to believe in the delusion that has now spread from Silicon Valley to the rest of the country, and indeed the world. That delusion says that we’re all going to get rich quick, because AGI [artificial general intelligence] is coming tomorrow.”

Financial executives willing to chance an outlay in generative AI, the CFOs and AI experts said, can follow seven tips to cut through the forecasting haze and seize the potential payoffs:

1. Approach ROI Flexibly

A rush into any “new, new thing” cries out for CFO skepticism. Yet when a potentially terrain-shifting technology emerges, top financial executives would do well to consider more flexibility in gauging ROI.

“As a CFO, the first thing you’ll say to someone coming to you for money is, ‘What’s the ROI?’”  Glenn Hopper, CFO at Eventus Advisory Group, said in an interview. “For something like AI, it’s very difficult to determine.”

Greater efficiency is often one of the most immediate payoffs, he said. AI can trim by as much as three days the time between delivery of a good or service and payment, or the day-to-sales outstanding, he said. It can also streamline just-in-time inventory control and avert errors.

“It’s hard without any prior knowledge to evaluate the potential return on investment,” EY-Parthenon Chief Economist Gregory Daco said in an interview. Identifying with precision the potential payoffs for each company sweeps away some of the fuzziness on potential gains.

“We work on a case-by-case basis with a number of clients to say, ‘OK, in your specific sector, for your company with X market position and an X total addressable market, we believe that AI could have this this type of return on investment if applied across these functions,” Daco said. “It’s really a case-by-case approach because every industry and company is different.”

Many of the companies that succeed with generative AI will embrace risk and experiment despite uncertainty over ROI, Rock said in an interview.

“If you get failure, that doesn’t necessarily mean you made a bad choice,” Rock said. “You can cut it off and re-route it to something else.” Rock founded Workhelix with Erik Brynjolfsson and Andy McAfee.

C-suite executives this year have shown flexibility in their expectations for ROI from generative AI, KPMG found in a June survey.

During the first quarter, 51% of business leaders expected the biggest gains in the next 12 months to come from higher productivity, with 47% expecting higher revenue as the No. 1 benefit, KPMG said.

The rankings flipped in Q2, with 52% of 100 respondents ranking higher revenue as the leading improvement, while greater productivity fell to 40%, according to KPMG.

Business leaders expect the biggest gain from generative AI to come from higher revenue rather than higher productivity

“How are you measuring your organization’s return on investment related to generative artificial intelligence?” Initial response from Q1 2024 compared with Q2.

2. Focus on longer term gains

Getting generative AI up and running often demands sizable up-front investment that could otherwise go to other operations with more certain, immediate returns, Rock said.

link

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.